翻訳と辞書
Words near each other
・ Reference Re Assisted Human Reproduction Act
・ Reference Re BC Motor Vehicle Act
・ Reference Re Canada Assistance Plan (BC)
・ Reference Re Companies' Creditors Arrangement Act
・ Reference Re Eskimos
・ Reference Re Farm Products Marketing Act (Ontario)
・ Reference Re Firearms Act
・ Reference Re Manitoba Language Rights
・ Reference Re Ng Extradition
・ Reference Re Persons of Japanese Race
・ Reference Re Provincial Electoral Boundaries (Sask)
・ Reference Re Public Service Employee Relations Act (Alta)
・ Reference Re Remuneration of Judges (No 2)
・ Reference Re Residential Tenancies Act (Ontario)
・ Reference Re Same-Sex Marriage
Reference Re Secession of Quebec
・ Reference Re Securities Act
・ Reference Re Senate Reform
・ Reference Re Supreme Court Act, ss 5 and 6
・ Reference Re Upper Churchill Water Rights Reversion Act (Nfld)
・ Reference scenario
・ Reference software
・ Reference surface
・ Reference table
・ Reference tone
・ Reference type
・ Reference Verification Methodology
・ Reference work
・ Reference.com
・ Referencer


Dictionary Lists
翻訳と辞書 辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ]
スポンサード リンク

Reference Re Secession of Quebec : ウィキペディア英語版
Reference Re Secession of Quebec

''Reference Re Secession of Quebec'', () 2 S.C.R. 217 was an opinion of the Supreme Court of Canada regarding the legality, under both Canadian and international law, of a unilateral secession of Quebec from Canada.
Both the Quebec government and the Canadian government stated that they were most pleased with the Supreme Court's opinion, pointing to different sections of the ruling.
==Background==
Following the election of a majority of Parti Québécois (PQ) Members of the National Assembly (MNAs) with 41.37% of the popular vote in the 1976 provincial election, the party formed a government and, in 1980, held a referendum. The government of the Province of Quebec asked the province's population if it should seek a mandate to negotiate sovereignty for Quebec coupled with the establishment of a new political and economic union with Canada. The referendum resulted in the defeat of the sovereignty option with 59.56% voting no on sovereignty. The PQ was nevertheless re-elected in 1981, this time promising not to hold a referendum.
In 1982, the federal government petitioned the Parliament of the United Kingdom in London to amend Canada's constitution so that in the future, all further amendments would take place by means of a process of consent involving only the Parliament of Canada and the legislatures of the provinces (several provinces objected). Up until this point, all amendments had taken place by means of Acts of the Parliament at Westminster, since the Canadian constitution was, strictly speaking, a simple statute of that Parliament.
Colloquially, the switch to a domestic amendment procedure was known as patriation. The particular formula for amendments that was adopted in 1982 was opposed by the then-government of Quebec, which also opposed the adoption of other constitutional changes made at the same time, such as the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms—although this opposition was not necessarily based on a rejection of the content of these changes, as opposed to the manner of their adoption, and the failure to include amendments specific to Quebec in the package. Also, Quebec had already at that time a more complete Charter that was adopted in 1975.
Two further attempts were made at amending the Canadian constitution in 1987-1990 and 1992 in a manner that, it was hoped, would have caused the Quebec legislature to adopt a motion supporting the revised constitution. These failed packages of constitutional reforms were known as the Meech Lake Accord and the Charlottetown Accord. Thus, in the mid-1990s, there was a widespread sense that the Constitution of Canada was not fully legitimate, because it had not yet received the formal approval of Quebec.
In 1994, the Parti Québécois was re-elected and announced that it would be initiating a
second referendum
to take place in 1995. This time, the question was on sovereignty with an optional partnership with Canada. The "no" side won by only a narrow margin. Prior to this referendum, the National Assembly of Quebec adopted a bill relating to the future of Quebec which laid out the Quebec's plan for secession in case of a winning referendum.
In response to the bill and the referendum result, several legal actions were initiated by opponents to the independence of Quebec, questioning the legality of secession. In 1996, Parti Québécois leader Lucien Bouchard announced that his government would make plans to hold another referendum when he was confident that the "winning conditions" were there, pointing to the political cost of losing a third referendum. In reaction to Bouchard's stated plans, Prime Minister Jean Chrétien initiated a reference to answer the legality of a unilateral declaration of independence from a Canadian province.

抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)
ウィキペディアで「Reference Re Secession of Quebec」の詳細全文を読む



スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース

Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.